Today, Miao huaiming's two good articles, 4717 words in total, are launched. It may take 120 minutes to read:
After examination, all the four masterpieces have serious problems and should be destroyed!
Author: Miao huaiming
In recent years, it's not easy to probe from the study to see the outside world of flowers, and write a few pieces of dog's theory. As a result, it's either blocked by the platform or scolded by netizens. So he had to lie down on the sofa, pretending to be a dead dog while sulking.
It seems that someone sent me a letter of appointment, asking me to be a judge. Why? I heard that toad wanted to eat swan meat. In my daydream of being a Nobel Prize judge, I simply asked me to practice with four famous works to prepare for going to Sweden three hundred years later. There is such a good thing in the world. Finally, you can gossip about other people's works. I t's just to satisfy your own gloomy psychology. How happy! So I worked hard all night to write a review report. The contents are as follows: after review, all four masterpieces have serious problems and should be destroyed! The details are as follows: the romance of the Three Kingdoms has the following problems: first, wrong position. In the Ming Dynasty, Cao Wei represented the imperial court, which was authentic. However, the author preferred Liu anti Cao to sing praises to a local separatist warlord, which was a serious problem of standing on the wrong side. 2、 Spread vicious rumors. As long as we compare the records of the Three Kingdoms with the book, we can know that the author not only does not respect the historical facts, but also deliberately fabricates such vicious rumors as using the east wind, fighting against the Confucians with words, and killing Huaxiong with warm wine, which have a bad social impact. Since it is a historical novel, it must be built on the basis of complete truth. Just like writing a diary, you must verify every detail of everything you write. Even if there is a plague isolated at home, you must rush out desperately and go to the party concerned to verify it face to face. Zhang Xuecheng, a scholar in the Qing Dynasty, once said that the book is divided into seven parts and three parts. Even 30% of the content of a work belongs to rumor. Such a book is not worthy of being called a masterpiece. 3、 Only the noble class, not the common people. In the book, which battle is not fought by soldiers, but the author put so many heroic deeds of grass-roots soldiers aside, just to write about a few people in power, especially the scholars. Zhuge Liang is a useless scholar. He is born a reactionary. What's his heart? Such reactionary literati should not say that they are scrupulous and should not be invited once. There are some problems in Outlaws of the Marsh: first, the novel does not write the mainstream, only the dark side. So many favors given to the common people by the court were not written, they did not know how to be grateful, they did not go to the positive report, but they went to write a group of robbers and bandits. 2、 Sing z'an songs for the underworld, ignoring the efforts of all levels of government to fight against the underworld. Behind the author, there must be an emissary who may be manipulated by foreign anti song forces, and suspected of violating the flow of traffic and wanting to be famous. 3、 Exaggerate violence, too bloody. Many times, the works are about cannibalism, but they don't condemn it. It can be seen that the author has changeable t'ai, a typical anti human. 4、 Discrimination against women. The women in the works are either shrews, such as sun Er Niang and Gu Da Sao, who give them very unpleasant nicknames and deliberately stigmatize them. It is infuriating that some women, such as pan Qiaoyun and Pan Jinlian, insult many of the good people of Pan family. The problems of journey to the West: first, worshiping foreign countries and fawning on foreign countries. My Tang is so powerful. I am peaceful in the Tang Dynasty. All nations come to worship me. The novel even let the people of Tang Dynasty go to foreign countries to learn from it. Where is the cultural confidence? Is the moon in India more round than in the Tang Dynasty? The author colludes with the anti Tang forces in the western regions and has ulterior motives. 2、 There are so many touching deeds on the way to get scriptures in the west, but they just write about monsters. After all, monsters are in the minority. The author generalizes and ignores the overall situation without seeing the mainstream. 3、 The team of collecting scriptures is a united whole. The author turns a blind eye to the contradiction between monkey king and Tangseng and zhubajie. He stirs up the differences, magnifies them infinitely and destroys the great cause of collecting scriptures. In fact, this is in cooperation with the anti Tang forces of western countries, and is a typical selling Gu ó thief. If the author goes to Wuji Gu ó and Chechi country to write, does he dare to write like this? 4、 The author has been a county magistrate and a member of the system. As a civil servant, he doesn't think about who he is eating and whose bowl he is carrying? When he got a bargain, he even sold himself. He went to sing praises to monkey king, who subverted the security of heaven. He should be punished. 5、 Many monsters in the works belong to wild protected animals. Monkey King and others have been eliminated for many times, or killed directly, or set fire to the ground. This is a typical wanton hunting of protected animals and destruction of the ecological environment, which is a serious illegal act. The author should be brought to justice. The problems of a dream of Red Mansions: first, living i n the SH è ng era of Taiping, the only purpose of literature should be to whitewash t à I Ping, sing Z à n songs, and promote positive energy. Ninety nine percent of the sunlight in life is ignored by the author, but he only writes about one percent of the dark side. There are so many correct little pink stories and so many touching inspirational stories in the world, but they just want to write a problem youth who plays truant, loves early and has bad deeds. They want to write a feudal declining family. Their eyes are only on those insignificant dark sides, which shows how dark the author's psychology is. 2、 The author made a rumor that Nuwa's mending the sky was absurd, which had never been proved. The author's writing was right in the head and bad in nature. There are a large number of vicious rumors in the book, which will not be listed here. 3、 The works publicize feudalism and superstition, and make up a story of returning tears for Jia Baoyu and Lin Daiyu. This foolish and backward thought will poison our readers. 4、 What's worse about this book is that the author set up a water army to sell books for himself. The leader of the book, the pseudonym of Zhiyanzhai, specially touts the author. Suggestions for handling: in view of the serious ideological and stance problems existing in the four masterpieces, only exposing the darkness, not praising the light, not positive energy, generalizing, fabricating and disseminating vicious rumors, the author has the sinister intention to cooperate with the overseas anti Tang and anti song forces to disturb the social order of the Tang and the Song Dynasties, and all of them should be banned and destroyed. We can't express our anger with rational and civilized language for these four inferior poisonous weeds. We should swear at them and express our full sense of morality and justice with obscene words. If the author is alive, they should be arrested immediately and punished severely. Such works with serious problems are regarded as four masterpieces, which shows that in the past few hundred years, most of the readers have psychological problems and are all morbid. They can't even see such poor quality works, which makes people sad. In addition to the four masterpieces, I would like to report Du Fu, who is regarded as the "saint of poetry" by fans. In the face of the rebellion of an Shi, the general soldiers and men share the same hatred and fight bravely to kill the enemy. As a court official, he should have cooperated actively and wrote a hymn every day. However, he lost his position and did not sing praises to the generals on the front line. Instead, he specially wrote about the dark side, exaggerating infinitely, destroying the great cause of pacification and rebellion, and being sinister. His "three officials" and "three distinctions" should be banned and destroyed immediately. At the same time, Tao Yuanming, Li, Tang Xianzu, who were civil servants but left without the approval of the organization, had to be reported. They had to fight Qu Yuan and Song Lian, who had been dealt with by the organization, against Sima Qian, Hai Rui and Hong Sheng, who had retaliated against the court and vilified the image of the emperor. They had to write about the dark side of their works, and there was no good man in their works. They had to retaliate against the defamation of examiners and examination system when they failed in the college entrance examination Li Bai, Bai Juyi, Han Yu, Liu Zongyuan, Su Shi, Ji Yun, the writers of Pu Songling and Wu Jingzi, born in the system of Taiping sh è ng who did not praise the great good situation but wrote about the dark side, Sima Xiangru, Cao Zhi, Yuan Zhen, Du Mu, Wen Tingyun, Liu Yong, Yuan Hongdao, Qian Qianyi, Yuan Mei, Gong Zizhen, who were free and lax and had serious life style problems, fabricated and spread vicious rumors Gu, Dongfang Shuo, Gan Bao and Liu Yiqing, who do not write inspiring main melody, Li Shangyin, Li Yu, Li Qingzhao, Nalan Xingde and Yu Huai, who spread negative energy with decadent voice, lost female writers Xue Tao and Liu Rushi, etc. After reviewing the history of Chinese literature, all the so-called famous writers in ancient China had serious problems. Their works did not meet the needs of the times at all. Tang poetry, Song Ci, Ming and Qing novels, opera and so on were all poisonous weeds. For thousands of years, hundreds of millions of readers are also brainwashed, good or bad, no position. The lessons of history are very painful. Literature has never played a good role since the beginning of mankind. Writers are enemies with ulterior motives. Our society needs practical things. We should ban useless literature, music, art, film and television, calligraphy, etc. because they can't satisfy hunger and resist cold. It is suggested to find a history of Chinese literature and destroy all of its works according to the above mentioned names. At the same time, it is suggested that schools at all levels cancel the course of Chinese literature history, and simply cancel the course of Chinese history and all the courses of liberal arts at the same time. Let's start anew and create a new world that human beings have never had.
If I were a Nobel Prize judge, I would vote for Fang Fang
Author: Miao huaiming
First of all, I'm not what the Internet calls fangfen. At first, when Fang Fang's diary became popular, he only read a few articles, and thought that it was just a retired old lady who said her own experiences and feelings in the face of disaster, and even thought that it was a little trivial and even wordy. What really attracts my attention and serious thinking about Fang Fang's diary phenomenon are those overwhelming opponents. Generally speaking, it's a personal freedom to like Fang Fang's diary or not. If you don't like it or don't like it, you can completely ignore it. You can also write your own diary. It doesn't matter if you write an article saying that Fang Fang's diary is not good. What shocked the author is that some people's hatred of each other's diaries has reached the level of gnashing their teeth and being totally irrational. They use all kinds of ugly language to abuse and curse an old man of their own grandmother's generation or mother's generation, even the basic principles of life are gone. Some even suggested that Fang Fang should be sent to prison. Others said that Fang Fang should be killed. There are many scolding words from Fang Fang, which can be summed up in the following two points: one is to hate Fang's writing only on the dark side, not on the bright side, not to sing, and lack of positive energy; the other is that Fang Fang's making a fool of his family and letting foreigners know about our dark things. As for the conspiracy theories such as Fang Fang's sabotage of the great cause of anti epidemic and cooperation with foreign anti Hu á forces, it is too absurd to comment here. In my opinion, these reasons are really untenable. First of all, there is no rule that writers can only sing, can't write dark, can't write sad, can't write suffering. In the face of the great disaster, everyone has his own way of expression. As long as he does not violate the laws and regulations of the country, he has the right to write out his true feelings. This society is diverse. Why force others to write according to your ideas? Why can't others write according to their own ideas and styles after they have written for a lifetime. You think you are patriotic, but there are ten thousand ways to be patriotic. Why do people express themselves differently from you is to sell their country, and only you are patriotic. Secondly, looking at the history of ancient and modern Chinese and foreign literature, those great writers whose works can be handed down do not